Understanding the case for flushing

00:03

The deterioration of pipes in a water distribution system is a major challenge for water utilities.

00:10

In some pipes, depending on their material and age, deposits can form on the inside walls.

00:17

This can cause hydraulic capacity to decrease over time.

00:22

Deposits can result from chemical precipitation, microbiological activity, and in the case of cast iron pipes, corrosion buildup.

00:30

Within a water distribution system, unidirectional flushing (UDF) can help to improve water quality.

00:37

Deposits can increase pipe roughness and decrease effective pipe diameter, possibly resulting in:

00:44

Inability to deliver fire flows.

00:46

Increased disinfectant demand.

00:49

Chlorine degradation.

00:52

Complaints about water taste, odor, and color.

00:56

And potentially, public health issues.

00:59

Furthermore, reduced effective pipe diameter can lead to reduced hydraulic capacity,

01:05

increased pumping costs, and lower residual pressure.

01:09

Certain pipe materials, such as cast iron, are more susceptible to these types of issues.

01:16

Unidirectional flushing can prolong the life expectancy of a distribution system and reduce the potential for waterborne diseases.

01:24

It can help remove biofilm growth and particulates that lead to chlorine loss, as well as taste, odor, and color concerns.

01:33

In InfoWater Pro UDF, unidirectional flushing is performed by first isolating a portion of the distribution system,

01:41

then opening fire hydrants or flushing valves.

01:44

These actions can ideally create enough velocity to scour pipes and remove unwanted materials.

01:50

The flushed water is then discharged through a hydrant.

01:54

Generally, unidirectional flushing begins in portions of the system closest to the water sources,

02:00

proceeding to the outward extents of the system.

02:03

It is important to understand the distinction among the three general flushing methods:

02:08

UDF, conventional flushing, and continuous blow-off.

02:13

UDF involves a systematic plan to direct flushed water in a single direction along the pipe to maximize velocity.

02:21

To do this, you close valves and open hydrants to create a one-way flow in the water mains.

02:27

This linear flow results in higher velocities,

02:31

typically 5 or 6 feet per second.

02:33

This method maximizes linear velocity near the pipe wall, making it ideal for removing biofilm and other more hardened corrosion materials.

02:42

The flush begins at a clean water source and ends at a hydrant, so that only clean water is used.

02:49

UDF also eliminates the chances of dirty water and debris being inadvertently transported

02:55

around the system and is the most efficient flushing method.

02:59

UDF is not a feasible solution in emergency situations, as it takes proper planning and time to carry out.

03:07

Conventional flushing is done without control of the flow direction—for example,

03:13

opening several hydrants in the same area at once until the water clears up.

03:17

This method is effective for removing loose sediment, but less effective at raising pipeline velocities.

03:25

Conventional flushing yields velocities of less than 2 feet per second, so it is not effective at removing deposits or biofilm.

03:33

It can also cause dirty water and debris to be inadvertently transported around the system.

03:39

As it is less effective at raising velocities, this method often requires larger amounts of water, decreasing its efficiency.

03:47

Conventional flushing is often used reactively to fix areas of poor water quality, or in response to aesthetic complaints.

03:56

Continuous blow-off consists of a small, continuous or intermittent water usage to refresh the line.

04:03

This is usually seen as a short-term preventive strategy and is often used to solve stagnation problems.

04:10

It has a comparatively low velocity of less than 1 foot per second, and can use a large amount of water, resulting in poor efficiency.

Video transcript

00:03

The deterioration of pipes in a water distribution system is a major challenge for water utilities.

00:10

In some pipes, depending on their material and age, deposits can form on the inside walls.

00:17

This can cause hydraulic capacity to decrease over time.

00:22

Deposits can result from chemical precipitation, microbiological activity, and in the case of cast iron pipes, corrosion buildup.

00:30

Within a water distribution system, unidirectional flushing (UDF) can help to improve water quality.

00:37

Deposits can increase pipe roughness and decrease effective pipe diameter, possibly resulting in:

00:44

Inability to deliver fire flows.

00:46

Increased disinfectant demand.

00:49

Chlorine degradation.

00:52

Complaints about water taste, odor, and color.

00:56

And potentially, public health issues.

00:59

Furthermore, reduced effective pipe diameter can lead to reduced hydraulic capacity,

01:05

increased pumping costs, and lower residual pressure.

01:09

Certain pipe materials, such as cast iron, are more susceptible to these types of issues.

01:16

Unidirectional flushing can prolong the life expectancy of a distribution system and reduce the potential for waterborne diseases.

01:24

It can help remove biofilm growth and particulates that lead to chlorine loss, as well as taste, odor, and color concerns.

01:33

In InfoWater Pro UDF, unidirectional flushing is performed by first isolating a portion of the distribution system,

01:41

then opening fire hydrants or flushing valves.

01:44

These actions can ideally create enough velocity to scour pipes and remove unwanted materials.

01:50

The flushed water is then discharged through a hydrant.

01:54

Generally, unidirectional flushing begins in portions of the system closest to the water sources,

02:00

proceeding to the outward extents of the system.

02:03

It is important to understand the distinction among the three general flushing methods:

02:08

UDF, conventional flushing, and continuous blow-off.

02:13

UDF involves a systematic plan to direct flushed water in a single direction along the pipe to maximize velocity.

02:21

To do this, you close valves and open hydrants to create a one-way flow in the water mains.

02:27

This linear flow results in higher velocities,

02:31

typically 5 or 6 feet per second.

02:33

This method maximizes linear velocity near the pipe wall, making it ideal for removing biofilm and other more hardened corrosion materials.

02:42

The flush begins at a clean water source and ends at a hydrant, so that only clean water is used.

02:49

UDF also eliminates the chances of dirty water and debris being inadvertently transported

02:55

around the system and is the most efficient flushing method.

02:59

UDF is not a feasible solution in emergency situations, as it takes proper planning and time to carry out.

03:07

Conventional flushing is done without control of the flow direction—for example,

03:13

opening several hydrants in the same area at once until the water clears up.

03:17

This method is effective for removing loose sediment, but less effective at raising pipeline velocities.

03:25

Conventional flushing yields velocities of less than 2 feet per second, so it is not effective at removing deposits or biofilm.

03:33

It can also cause dirty water and debris to be inadvertently transported around the system.

03:39

As it is less effective at raising velocities, this method often requires larger amounts of water, decreasing its efficiency.

03:47

Conventional flushing is often used reactively to fix areas of poor water quality, or in response to aesthetic complaints.

03:56

Continuous blow-off consists of a small, continuous or intermittent water usage to refresh the line.

04:03

This is usually seen as a short-term preventive strategy and is often used to solve stagnation problems.

04:10

It has a comparatively low velocity of less than 1 foot per second, and can use a large amount of water, resulting in poor efficiency.

Video quiz

Required for course completion

What is the water velocity that can typically be expected during UDF?

(Select one)
Select an answer

1/1 questions left unanswered

The deterioration of pipes in a water distribution system is a major challenge for water utilities. Unidirectional flushing (UDF) can help to improve water quality.

Pipe Deposits:

  • In some pipes, depending on material and age, deposits can form on inside walls.
  • Can cause hydraulic capacity to decrease over time.
  • Can result from chemical precipitation, microbiological activity, and in the case of cast iron pipes, corrosion buildup.

Two side-by-side cross-section views of pipes with deposits, rust and corrosion on inside walls.

  • Deposits can increase pipe roughness and decrease effective pipe diameter, possibly resulting in:
    • Inability to deliver fire flows
    • Increased disinfectant demand
    • Chlorine degradation
    • Complaints about water taste, odor, and color
    • Potential for public health issues
    • Increased pumping costs
    • Reduced hydraulic capacity
    • Lower residual pressure
  • Certain pipe materials, such as cast iron, are more susceptible to issues.

Unidirectional Flushing:

  • Can prolong the life expectancy of a distribution system and reduce the potential for waterborne diseases.
  • Can help remove biofilm growth and particulates that lead to chlorine loss, as well as taste, odor, and color concerns.
  • In InfoWater Pro UDF, unidirectional flushing is performed by first isolating a portion of the distribution system, then opening fire hydrants or flushing valves.
  • Can ideally create enough velocity to scour pipes and remove unwanted materials.
  • Flushed water is then discharged through a hydrant.

A hydrant being flushed, with brown water pouring from the hydrant onto the grass.

  • Generally begins in portions of system closest to water sources, proceeding to outward extents.
  • Important to understand distinction among three flushing methods: UDF, conventional flushing, and continuous blow-off.

UDF Method:

  • Most efficient flushing method.
  • Involves systematic plan to direct flushed water in single direction along pipe to maximize velocity—can close valves and open hydrants to create one-way flow in water mains.
  • Linear flow results in higher velocities, typically 5 or 6 feet per second.

A graphical representation of the UDF method of flushing, with a hydrant in the middle, several closed valves, and arrows showing the path of unidirectional flow of 1,200 gpm at 5 fps to the hydrant.

  • Maximizes linear velocity near pipe wall—ideal for removing biofilm and hardened corrosion materials.
  • Flush begins at clean water source and ends at hydrant, so only clean water is used.
  • Eliminates chances of dirty water and debris being inadvertently transported around the system.
  • Not feasible in emergency situations, as it takes proper planning and time to carry out.

Conventional Flushing:

  • No control of flow direction—for example, opening several hydrants at once in same area until water clears up.
  • Effective for removing loose sediment, but less effective at raising pipeline velocities.
  • Yields velocities of less than 2 feet per second, so not effective at removing deposits or biofilm.
  • Can cause dirty water and debris to be inadvertently transported around the system.
  • With lower velocities, often requires larger amounts of water, decreasing efficiency.
  • Often used reactively to fix areas of poor water quality or in response to aesthetic complaints.

Continuous Blow-Off:

  • Consists of a small, continuous or intermittent water usage to refresh the line.
  • Usually seen as a short-term preventive strategy.
  • Often used to solve stagnation problems.
  • Comparatively low velocity of less than 1 foot per second, and can use large amount of water, resulting in poor efficiency.

 

Was this information helpful?