& Construction

Integrated BIM tools, including Revit, AutoCAD, and Civil 3D
& Manufacturing

Professional CAD/CAM tools built on Inventor and AutoCAD
Integrated BIM tools, including Revit, AutoCAD, and Civil 3D
Professional CAD/CAM tools built on Inventor and AutoCAD
Learn how to identify common defects, understand why they form, and what to do to minimize them.
Type:
Tutorial
Length:
8 min.
Transcript
00:04
Visual defects are blemishes on the
00:05
part that detract from its aesthetic appearance
00:09
depending on the defect in its location.
00:11
Some visual defects can also affect structural integrity of the part.
00:15
Sync marks are typically small depressions on the surface of a
00:18
molded part that develop above thicker structures on the underside.
00:22
The visibility is a function of the color of the part as well as its surface texture.
00:26
So the depth of the depression is only one criterion.
00:29
Sync marks do not affect the part strength or
00:32
function but are considered to be severe quality defects
00:37
as plastic cools, it shrinks a little
00:39
to compensate during this cooling period.
00:41
Extra material is forced into the mold to fill the gaps.
00:45
Sick marks develop when the plastic material in
00:47
thicker section shrinks without sufficient packing compensation.
00:51
After the surface material has solidified,
00:53
the hotter core material continues to cool.
00:56
A shrinkage pulls the surface of the main wall inward causing a sink mark.
01:01
If your part experiences unbalanced heat removal, it is likely to have sink marks.
01:06
Uneven heat removal is caused by design features such as ribs, legs,
01:10
bosses or anything that creates changes in wall thickness.
01:14
Other causes include high melt temperature
01:16
and insufficient packing due to time or pressure.
01:20
Let's see how to identify visual defects in in an injection molding simulation.
01:25
With injection molding simulation. The visual defects guided results
01:29
show you the location of both saint marks and
01:31
mud lines superimposed on the same model outline.
01:35
If you have defined aesthetic faces,
01:37
the guided results show which of the aesthetic
01:39
faces are impacted by these visual defects.
01:42
Lets turn off the we line result and focus first on the saint
01:45
marks.
01:47
As you can see when sink marks develop,
01:49
they appear above thicker structures such as ribs and bosses,
01:52
the thicker and underlying structure, the deeper the sink mark is likely to be,
01:58
you can move the tolerance slider to show how
02:00
the sync marks compare with your parts tolerant specifications
02:06
to see how the saint marks might appear on the surface of the part.
02:09
Switch to the Saint Marks visualization result,
02:12
use the magnification tool to exaggerate the marks to see them more clearly
02:18
and the surface finish tool to see how
02:20
they might appear with different surface finishes.
02:23
What can you do about these visual defects?
02:26
The guided results provide suggestions for how to reduce
02:29
the appearance of Saint Marks and Wild lines.
02:32
The first suggestion is to edit the model in
02:34
injection molding.
02:35
A good rule of thumb is to keep part thicknesses
02:38
as thin and uniform as possible to reduce surface defects.
02:42
You can edit the simulation model to see the effect
02:44
of various design changes without affecting the original model design.
02:50
Another option is to relocate the gate to or near a thicker section.
02:55
This allows more material to be packed into the
02:57
thicker sections before thinner sections freeze and prevent further flow
03:02
or you could decrease the melt temperature.
03:04
This reduces the volumetric shrinkage experienced by the plastic melt as it cools
03:09
since it doesn't have to cool and shrink so much before it freezes.
03:14
Wild lines are both a weakness and a visible flaw that are often unavoidable.
03:19
They can make the part visually unacceptable and also
03:22
cause structural problems depending on where they occur.
03:24
On the part.
03:25
Sometimes the best you can do with wild lines is to move them.
03:29
We lines are caused by a flow front that
03:31
splits and comes together around a hole or other feature
03:35
or if the part has multiple gates,
03:38
if the different flow fronts cool too much before meeting,
03:40
they may not recombine well causing a weakness in the molded part,
03:45
a line notch and or color change can also appear
03:49
if there are multiple flow paths for the plastic to fill the mold,
03:52
your part is likely to have wild lines.
03:55
There are several causes of multiple
03:57
flow paths including multiple injection locations,
03:59
design features that split the flow
04:02
and variable wall thicknesses that cause the flow front speed to change.
04:06
Let's turn off the saint mark results and look instead at the we line result,
04:10
you'll notice there are a great many potential wild lines and they
04:13
appear around holes and or around structures like ribs and bosses.
04:18
While we lines are unavoidable,
04:20
you can try to improve the quality or strength of the wild line
04:23
and move it to where it will have less of an impact.
04:26
The guided results suggest moving the injection location or editing
04:30
the model to move the location of wild lines.
04:34
This wild line result shows the different wild
04:36
line pattern resulting from changing the injection location.
04:41
Another option is to improve the quality of the wild line
04:43
by increasing the melt temperature or increasing the injection speed.
04:47
So they recombine better when they meet.
04:50
This wild line results show there are fewer
04:52
wild lines when the melt is injected faster.
04:55
Similarly, if you move the injection location,
04:57
so the wild lines form closer to the gates,
04:60
they will be formed at a higher flow front temperature and will be stronger.
05:06
A short shot is a term used when the part is not completely filled,
05:11
the flow front freezes off before all the flow paths are filled.
05:15
An air trap is an air or gas bubble that is
05:17
caught inside the mold cavity by converging polymer melt fronts.
05:22
They can both be visual and structural problems and
05:24
could be eliminated with appropriate part and mold design.
05:28
Air traps usually occur in areas that fill last.
05:31
The trapped air can cause incomplete filling and packing and
05:34
will often cause its surface blemish in the final part,
05:38
if there are multiple variable length flow paths or insufficient venting,
05:42
then your part is likely to have air traps
05:45
as far as possible. Minimize variable wall thickness for more balanced flow paths.
05:50
The air trap result shows the location of potential air traps.
05:54
By moving or adding injection locations,
05:56
you can position the air traps where they can be more readily vented.
06:00
You can compare the various injection locations
06:02
to see which one locates the air traps most effectively
06:07
an injection mark is a visual defect that appears
06:10
on the part where the plastic enters the part.
06:13
Every injection molding part has an injection mark for every gate
06:17
that shows where the plastic was injected,
06:20
injection marks cannot be avoided,
06:22
but you can place the gates where the marks are not very visible.
06:26
This quality prediction result shows that the location of
06:29
the injection location impacts the quality at that location.
06:34
Placing the injection location in the middle of the
06:36
flat face is very visible to the consumer.
06:39
Placing it around the side still leaves a mark
06:41
but the mark is less obtrusive
06:44
solving.
06:45
One problem can often introduce other problems to the injection molding process.
06:49
Each potential solution therefore requires consideration of all
06:53
relevant aspects of the mold design specification.
Video transcript
00:04
Visual defects are blemishes on the
00:05
part that detract from its aesthetic appearance
00:09
depending on the defect in its location.
00:11
Some visual defects can also affect structural integrity of the part.
00:15
Sync marks are typically small depressions on the surface of a
00:18
molded part that develop above thicker structures on the underside.
00:22
The visibility is a function of the color of the part as well as its surface texture.
00:26
So the depth of the depression is only one criterion.
00:29
Sync marks do not affect the part strength or
00:32
function but are considered to be severe quality defects
00:37
as plastic cools, it shrinks a little
00:39
to compensate during this cooling period.
00:41
Extra material is forced into the mold to fill the gaps.
00:45
Sick marks develop when the plastic material in
00:47
thicker section shrinks without sufficient packing compensation.
00:51
After the surface material has solidified,
00:53
the hotter core material continues to cool.
00:56
A shrinkage pulls the surface of the main wall inward causing a sink mark.
01:01
If your part experiences unbalanced heat removal, it is likely to have sink marks.
01:06
Uneven heat removal is caused by design features such as ribs, legs,
01:10
bosses or anything that creates changes in wall thickness.
01:14
Other causes include high melt temperature
01:16
and insufficient packing due to time or pressure.
01:20
Let's see how to identify visual defects in in an injection molding simulation.
01:25
With injection molding simulation. The visual defects guided results
01:29
show you the location of both saint marks and
01:31
mud lines superimposed on the same model outline.
01:35
If you have defined aesthetic faces,
01:37
the guided results show which of the aesthetic
01:39
faces are impacted by these visual defects.
01:42
Lets turn off the we line result and focus first on the saint
01:45
marks.
01:47
As you can see when sink marks develop,
01:49
they appear above thicker structures such as ribs and bosses,
01:52
the thicker and underlying structure, the deeper the sink mark is likely to be,
01:58
you can move the tolerance slider to show how
02:00
the sync marks compare with your parts tolerant specifications
02:06
to see how the saint marks might appear on the surface of the part.
02:09
Switch to the Saint Marks visualization result,
02:12
use the magnification tool to exaggerate the marks to see them more clearly
02:18
and the surface finish tool to see how
02:20
they might appear with different surface finishes.
02:23
What can you do about these visual defects?
02:26
The guided results provide suggestions for how to reduce
02:29
the appearance of Saint Marks and Wild lines.
02:32
The first suggestion is to edit the model in
02:34
injection molding.
02:35
A good rule of thumb is to keep part thicknesses
02:38
as thin and uniform as possible to reduce surface defects.
02:42
You can edit the simulation model to see the effect
02:44
of various design changes without affecting the original model design.
02:50
Another option is to relocate the gate to or near a thicker section.
02:55
This allows more material to be packed into the
02:57
thicker sections before thinner sections freeze and prevent further flow
03:02
or you could decrease the melt temperature.
03:04
This reduces the volumetric shrinkage experienced by the plastic melt as it cools
03:09
since it doesn't have to cool and shrink so much before it freezes.
03:14
Wild lines are both a weakness and a visible flaw that are often unavoidable.
03:19
They can make the part visually unacceptable and also
03:22
cause structural problems depending on where they occur.
03:24
On the part.
03:25
Sometimes the best you can do with wild lines is to move them.
03:29
We lines are caused by a flow front that
03:31
splits and comes together around a hole or other feature
03:35
or if the part has multiple gates,
03:38
if the different flow fronts cool too much before meeting,
03:40
they may not recombine well causing a weakness in the molded part,
03:45
a line notch and or color change can also appear
03:49
if there are multiple flow paths for the plastic to fill the mold,
03:52
your part is likely to have wild lines.
03:55
There are several causes of multiple
03:57
flow paths including multiple injection locations,
03:59
design features that split the flow
04:02
and variable wall thicknesses that cause the flow front speed to change.
04:06
Let's turn off the saint mark results and look instead at the we line result,
04:10
you'll notice there are a great many potential wild lines and they
04:13
appear around holes and or around structures like ribs and bosses.
04:18
While we lines are unavoidable,
04:20
you can try to improve the quality or strength of the wild line
04:23
and move it to where it will have less of an impact.
04:26
The guided results suggest moving the injection location or editing
04:30
the model to move the location of wild lines.
04:34
This wild line result shows the different wild
04:36
line pattern resulting from changing the injection location.
04:41
Another option is to improve the quality of the wild line
04:43
by increasing the melt temperature or increasing the injection speed.
04:47
So they recombine better when they meet.
04:50
This wild line results show there are fewer
04:52
wild lines when the melt is injected faster.
04:55
Similarly, if you move the injection location,
04:57
so the wild lines form closer to the gates,
04:60
they will be formed at a higher flow front temperature and will be stronger.
05:06
A short shot is a term used when the part is not completely filled,
05:11
the flow front freezes off before all the flow paths are filled.
05:15
An air trap is an air or gas bubble that is
05:17
caught inside the mold cavity by converging polymer melt fronts.
05:22
They can both be visual and structural problems and
05:24
could be eliminated with appropriate part and mold design.
05:28
Air traps usually occur in areas that fill last.
05:31
The trapped air can cause incomplete filling and packing and
05:34
will often cause its surface blemish in the final part,
05:38
if there are multiple variable length flow paths or insufficient venting,
05:42
then your part is likely to have air traps
05:45
as far as possible. Minimize variable wall thickness for more balanced flow paths.
05:50
The air trap result shows the location of potential air traps.
05:54
By moving or adding injection locations,
05:56
you can position the air traps where they can be more readily vented.
06:00
You can compare the various injection locations
06:02
to see which one locates the air traps most effectively
06:07
an injection mark is a visual defect that appears
06:10
on the part where the plastic enters the part.
06:13
Every injection molding part has an injection mark for every gate
06:17
that shows where the plastic was injected,
06:20
injection marks cannot be avoided,
06:22
but you can place the gates where the marks are not very visible.
06:26
This quality prediction result shows that the location of
06:29
the injection location impacts the quality at that location.
06:34
Placing the injection location in the middle of the
06:36
flat face is very visible to the consumer.
06:39
Placing it around the side still leaves a mark
06:41
but the mark is less obtrusive
06:44
solving.
06:45
One problem can often introduce other problems to the injection molding process.
06:49
Each potential solution therefore requires consideration of all
06:53
relevant aspects of the mold design specification.
For more, see: Will my part have visual defects?. Airtraps. Sink marks. Weld lines.
How to buy
Privacy | Do not sell or share my personal information | Cookie preferences | Report noncompliance | Terms of use | Legal | © 2025 Autodesk Inc. All rights reserved
Sign in for the best experience
Save your progress
Get access to courses
Receive personalized recommendations
May we collect and use your data?
Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?
Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.